Several weeks remain before the release of the report prepared by the House Select Committee on Property Tax Relief and Appraisal Reform, but the early word is that it will recommend big changes to the current appraisal appeal system. After numerous meetings around the state, Chairman John Otto (R-Dayton) has identified one of the biggest perceived problems as lack of independence of the Appraisal Review Board. As one of several recommendations to address this, he (and the committee) will recommend the creation of a pilot program in which a board made up of MAI appraisers will hear protests of commercial property valuations over $1,000,000 from Harris, Dallas, Bexar, Travis, and Tarrant counties. I asked Representative Otto whether this would replace the right to file an appeal for judicial review, and he confirmed for me that the order of this review board would be appealable using the same remedies currently available to appeal any Appraisal Review Board order. More to come...
Blog
« September 2008 | Main | November 2008 »
October 2008
October 23, 2008
Major Changes Recommended for 2009 Legislative Session
Posted at 11:22 AM in by Joshua Estes, Legislative Updates | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
October 21, 2008
The Peoples Gas, Light, and Coke Co. v. Harrison Central Appraisal District
A natural gas distribution company located in Chicago purchased gas from various suppliers. A substantial amount of gas was located at a storage facility in Texas. The company had contractual rights to take delivery of the gas, but under federal law was not allowed to take physical possession of it. Possession and control over the gas remained with the pipeline. The company objected to taxation of the gas claiming that it only owned contractual rights, not the actual gas itself and also claiming that the gas was exempt from taxation because it was in the stream of interstate commerce. The court disagreed finding the company owned an allocable portion of the gas. However, it held that storage of the gas, which had previously entered the interstate transportation system, did not remove the gas from the stream of interstate commerce because the company had no control over storage decisions and because storage of gas was an integral function of interstate transportation of gas. The fact that storage allowed the company to take physical delivery of the gas at peak delivery times did not alter its interstate commerce character. Finally, the court held that the gas could not be taxed on a proportional basis because its owner had no offices or employees in Texas and had no physical control over the gas. It held that any local governmental services provided to the gas, such as police and fire protection, were adequately compensated by the property taxes paid by the pipeline company on the pipeline system’s assets.
Click here to review the underlying case of the Peoples Gas, Light and Coke Co. v. Harrison Central Appraisal District, No. 06-07-00103-CV (Tex. App.-Texarkana, September 24, 2008, no pet. h.). (to be published.)
John Brusniak, Jr.
Posted at 09:00 AM in by John Brusniak, Jr., Case Law Digests | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
October 17, 2008
Can you retroactively lose your Freeport Exemption?
APPRAISAL DISTRICT ATTEMPTING TO RETROACTIVELY REMOVE FREEPORT EXEMPTIONS USING 25.25(c)(1)
Taxing entities are always on the lookout for new funding sources, and a North Texas appraisal district has found one: using 25.25(c)(1) to retroactively remove freeport exemptions granted in the five previous years. There has been plenty of litigation regarding clerical errors, but I do not believe it necessary to resort to courts' opinions because this action clearly falls outside the remedies allowed in the tax code. Section 1.04(18) says that a mistake in judgment in the making of a determination cannot be included in the definition of clerical error, and the granting of an exemption is clearly a judgment call. If an appraisal district is ultimately successful in this attempt to remove exemptions, it could result in enormous retroactive tax liabilities.
As always, please feel free to contact me to discuss this or any other property tax issue.
Joshua Estes
Posted at 09:48 AM in by Joshua Estes, Exemptions | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)







